Close

July 2, 2018

The Bay Area’s Median Home Price Climbs to $1 Million in May

July 2, 2018

The Bay Area’s Median Home Price Climbs to $1 Million in May

Executive Summary:

  • The Bay Area’s median home price reached $1 million in May, a 17 percent year-over-year increase, with Silicon Valley continuing to post 30 percent appreciation.
  • Homes sales activity matched last May, with San Francisco showing the strongest gain, up by 7 percent year over year. Napa County sales were slower than last year. Higher-priced sales rose up by about 30 percent.
  • Activity in Napa and Sonoma counties was relatively slower than in the rest of the Bay Area.
  • More new listings helped boost sales, especially for homes priced between $1 million and $2 million, which posted a 26 percent increase from last May. Santa Clara County listings jumped the most, at 14 percent.
  • Other housing-market indicators also suggest strengthening demand:
    • Homes generally sold in 12 days across all price ranges.
    • The share of homes that sold for more than asking price trended higher again, moving up to 75 percent.
    • The average share of sales that had price reductions also trended lower, bottoming out at 7 percent in March and remaining at 9 percent in May

It is with almost no surprise to note that the Bay Area’s median home price kept rising rapidly in May to reach $1 million, a 17 percent year-over-year increase. All regions continued to post the same price growth trends observed in previous months. Marin County recorded the smallest annual appreciation, with prices up by 5 percent from last May. Still, with strong price growth in previous months, Marin County’s median home price has grown by 9 percent year to date. Year-to-date median price growth was the slowest in Napa County, up by 2 percent. However, Napa County also continued to see home sales activity lag, a trend that began last year. Santa Clara County saw the most median price growth in the Bay Area, up by 29 percent, followed by a 16 percent jump in Alameda County.

Overall, Bay Area home sales lined up with last May, with some regions seeing slightly more activity and some slowing slightly. Napa County saw the largest decline in sales from last May, down by 17 percent. San Francisco saw the largest sales gains, up by 7 percent. Figure 1 illustrates total Bay Area sales over the last three years, with orange squares noting sales in the last four Mays. While this year’s sales matched 2017, they were slightly higher than in 2015 and 2016. It will be interesting to observe activity over the next couple of months, when annual home sales typically peak.

Activity was again dominated by a large increase in higher-priced sales, with homes priced between $1 million and $2 million rising by 26 percent, those priced between $2 million and $3 million jumping by 37 percent, and those priced higher than $3 million up by 32 percent.

Figure 1: Total home sales in the Bay Area

Source: Terradatum, Inc. from data provided by local MLSes, June 7, 2018

A slight uptick in new listings in May could help boost summer sales activity. There was an overall 4 percent increase in new listings, with the largest gains in Santa Clara County, up by 14 percent; Napa County, up by 23 percent; and Alameda County, up by 12 percent. San Francisco inventory continued to trend lower, with a 22 percent decline in new listings compared with last May. The increase in new listings was relatively stronger for homes priced between $1 million and $ 2 million, with a 26 percent gain. New listings for homes priced between $2 million and $3 million increased by 23 percent, while the inventory of homes priced above $3 million saw 18 percent more new listings. Figure 2 summarizes regional changes in new listings by price range. The largest gain was in Alameda County for homes priced above $3 million, with a 183 percent increase. Note that the chart is scaled down to help better visualize overall trends.  While the most-affordable segment posted an 8 percent decline in new listings, Napa and Alameda counties were the only regions with more new listings below $1 million. San Francisco showed a decline in new listings across all price ranges.

Figure 2 :Year-over-year change in new listings by Bay Area county

Source: Terradatum, Inc. from data provided by local MLSes, June 7, 2018

More new listings caused total inventory to decline at a slower pace than has been the case in recent months, though not enough to markedly improve conditions. Inventory dropped by 6 percent from last May, with declines seen in all regions, especially in San Francisco. Nevertheless, higher-priced inventory improved, with the largest jump in homes priced between $1 million and $3 million. Figure 3 illustrates inventory levels by price range over the last three years. What stands out is the large increase in supply between $1 million and $2 million, which is now at the highest level in three years. The biggest driver of the jump was the increase in inventory in Santa Clara County, up by about 350 homes from last May, followed by Alameda County, up by about 150 homes. More inventory will certainly boost June sales in those counties, as it has helped drive sales in the previous couple of months. The inventory of homes priced below $1 million now represents only about half of properties on the market. Two years ago, that price point represented two-thirds of the inventory.

Figure 3: Bay Area housing inventory by price range

Source: Terradatum, Inc. from data provided by local MLSes, June 7, 2018

Despite more inventory at higher price ranges, absorption rates did not abate and increased across all higher price ranges and most regions except Napa County. Absorption of homes between $1 million and $2 million increased by 6 percent, from 45 percent last May to 51 percent this May, and similar growth was seen in higher price ranges. San Francisco posted the biggest increase in absorption rates from last May, up by 8 percent to 39 percent. Silicon Valley maintained the highest absorption rate, at almost 50 percent.

Furthermore, other housing-market indicators also suggest strengthening buyer demand. In May, homes generally sold in 12 days, the same pace of sales as last year, and even in higher price ranges. Homes priced between $2 million and $3 million in Napa and Sonoma counties lingered somewhat longer on the market in May, though homes priced above $3 million in those regions sold much quicker than they did last year. As previously noted, overall indicators for Napa and Sonoma counties suggest some slowing in the $2-million-to-$3-million price range.

Lastly, the share of homes that sold for more than asking price continued to trend higher, with 75 percent of properties fetching premiums. The fiercest competition was for homes priced between $1 million and $2 million, with 82 percent selling for more than asking price, and those in Silicon Valley, where almost 90 percent of properties sold for more than asking price. Keep in mind that some real estate professionals may be pricing homes below their market value, which can skew trends.

Nevertheless, homebuyers remain persistent and continue to fuel housing demand in the Bay Area. Recent mortgage rate hikes could have caused some buyers to expedite their search or even enter the market sooner than they were planning. As our recent mortgage-rate analysis showed, while further Federal Reserve interest-rate increases are expected, mortgage rates are not projected to rise at the same pace and are already very close to their new longer-term average.

The question now is which housing-market indicators will be the earliest signs of a tipping point in this cycle. A lack of inventory, strong employment growth, and tech advances that lead to speedier real estate transactions make it difficult to rely on traditional gauges such as sales, inventory increases, days on market, or even the ratio of sales price to list price. The number of price reductions could be an indicator worth watching going forward, though at this point, it still suggests tightening in the market. Figure 4 illustrates changes in the share of sales that had price reductions between this May and the year prior. Negative changes suggest fewer reductions than last year, while positive changes suggest an increase in reductions.

Other than a few outliers for the highest-priced homes in the East Bay and Sonoma County, there were generally fewer reductions than recorded last year. Sonoma and Napa county markets are still recovering from last October’s wildfires, which is affecting patterns. In Alameda and Contra Costa counties, the drop in price reductions for homes priced higher than $3 million also follows more bidding wars, suggesting that fewer reductions reflect more demand for the price range in those areas. Figure 5 illustrates the share of Bay Area home sales with price reductions going back to 2005. Following the spike in reductions between the turmoil years of 2008 and 2012, reductions have oscillated relatively steadily since 2013 and have followed traditional housing market seasonality. May was generally the lowest point in the year. Over the last year, the seasonal increase was relatively smaller, reaching only 15 percent, where in the previous five years it peaked at more than 20 percent. Also, the market reached the trough in March this year, with only 7 percent of homes requiring price reductions.

Figure 4: Change in the share of price reductions by Bay Area county, May 2017 versus May 2018

Source: Terradatum, Inc. from data provided by local MLSes, June 7, 2018

Figure 5: Share of sales that had price reductions

Source: Terradatum, Inc. from data provided by local MLSes, June 7, 2018

Selma Hepp is Pacific Union’s Chief Economist and Vice President of Business Intelligence. Her previous positions include Chief Economist at Trulia, senior economist for the California Association of Realtors, and economist and manager of public policy and homeownership at the National Association of Realtors. She holds a Master of Arts in Economics from the State University of New York (SUNY), Buffalo, and a Ph.D. in Urban and Regional Planning and Design from the University of Maryland.

Source: https://pacunion.us/2JF4kAu